Missile Defense

On the radar: Menendez and Blunt on sanctions; EU’s chance to help Iran talks; Levin on cuts; ABM abrogation in hindsight; Growing up near Rocky Flats; IAEA grace period for Iran; and Secrecy and the “Super.”   Read more »
Posted on June 13, 2012
  On the radar: Levy on Iran talks; Latest New START data; Obama’s decisions with Stuxnet; Lewis on Payne; Wolfsthal debates Schake; Nuclear jobs; Tauscher on EPAA; and 10 creepy abandoned ICBM silos.   Read more »
Posted on June 1, 2012
In a difficult fiscal environment, the United States continues to throw billions of dollars down the drain on missile defense systems.  Instead of making us more secure, the system has limited capabilities to actually protect the United States and its allies.  And it makes Russian (and Chinese) military planners nervous, a situation that could quickly spiral out of control and into a Cold War-esque arms race. Read more »
Posted by Kelly Bronk on September 26, 2011
The Budget Crisis Offers Opportunity to Bend the Arc of Nuclear Policy - Joe Cirincione in Think Progress Read more »
Posted on August 12, 2011
A Presidential Policy Directive for a New Nuclear Path - Robert S. Norris and Hans M. Kristensen in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Read more »
Posted on August 11, 2011
Hawks Push for Iraq-Style Sanctions on Iran - Eli Clifton in Think Progress Read more »
Posted on August 9, 2011
$35B Missile Defense Misses Bullet With Bullet - Elliot Blair Smith and Gopal Ratnam in Bloomberg Read more »
Posted on August 5, 2011
It wasn't the mutants. It was humans that caused the Cuban Missile Crisis. Only luck saved us from nuclear war. But other than that, the new film, X-Men: First Class, gets a lot right about the historic crisis that is central to its plot. Read more »
Posted by Joe Cirincione on June 16, 2011
The United States spends roughly $54 billion a year on nuclear weapons and related programs, with plans in place to spend roughly $10 billion more per year on new nuclear submarines, missiles, and bombers. If this massive expenditure goes through as planned, it could overshadow U.S. efforts to reduce the role and number of nuclear weapons. Read more »
Posted by Ben Loehrke on May 17, 2011
The Sustainable Partnership with Russia Group, or SuPR Group, today launched a report with recommendations for the U.S. and Russia to continue working toward reductions in their nuclear stockpiles and to tackle top security challenges, including nuclear proliferation.  "American national security interests are best served by shedding the unnecessary weapons and concepts of the Cold War,” said Joe Cirincione, President of Ploughshares Fund, a participant and supporter of the Group.  Read more »
Posted by Sarah Beth Cross on May 4, 2011