Ploughshares Blog: CTBT & Nuclear testing

Recently, we’ve heard a great deal about the possibility of a third nuclear test in North Korea. Though the initial speculation of an immediate test a few weeks ago was a false alarm, recent satellite imagery has shown that the infrastructure at the site is ready for a test at any time – all North Korea has to do is insert a nuclear explosive device in the underground tunnel and seal it. Read more »
Posted by Megan Murphy on June 12, 2012
  How many tests are enough before you know that nuclear weapons are unacceptably destructive? The answer, it seems, is 2,053. That is the number of nuclear tests conducted worldwide since the Manhattan Project’s initial Trinity explosion in Los Alamos, New Mexico in 1945. Shockingly, over half of these tests have taken place here in the United States. Read more »
Posted by Megan Murphy on January 25, 2012
Today, the Ploughshares-funded Arms Control Association (ACA) released a new report, "Now More Than Ever: The Case for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty," detailing the case for U.S. ratification of the 1996 Comprehensive Test  Ban Treaty (CTBT) and announced a new web site, www.ProjectfortheCTBT.org featuring information and resources on nuclear testing and the CTBT. Read more »
Posted on February 18, 2010
"It's not an exaggeration to say that much of the nuclear weapons policy for the planet will be decided right here in this state," David Culp, a non-proliferation lobbyist at the Friends Committee on National Legislation, told a Utah audience.  That's because ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) will probably need Senators Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett in order to pass; both opposed the treaty 1999. If the U.S. Read more »
Posted on January 25, 2010
Daryl G. Kimball, executive director of the Ploughshares-funded Arms Control Association, debunked some of the myths about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) put forth in a recent op-ed by Senator John Kyl (R-AZ). “If Washington fails to fulfill its commitment to join the CTBT," writes Kimball, "U.S. Read more »
Posted on November 4, 2009
“The second Senate debate on the test ban treaty pits an old way of thinking about nuclear war against today’s totally different threat,” writes Jessica Mathews of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mathews argues that scientists have developed the technology needed to ensure reliability of nuclear weapons without testing.  She added that North Korea’s underground test in 2006 was detected instantly with available technology. “Giving u Read more »
Posted on October 21, 2009
Senator John McCain, who helped vote down U.S. ratification of a nuclear test ban treaty 10 years ago, said he would now consider supporting it. McCain has embraced Obama's goal of eliminating all the world's nuclear weapons and said that a global test ban would be a step forward if it were implemented prudently. Read more »
Posted by Deborah Bain on July 27, 2009
"I think we can fundamentally change U.S. nuclear policy and in doing so, change the world. But it won’t be easy,” Ploughshares Fund's Joe Cirincione told the Washington Diplomat. “The next 12 months are absolutely crucial. Read more »
Posted by Deborah Bain on July 13, 2009
In the lore of the nuclear arms race, the Central Nevada Test Area has occupied a special place of mystery. Read more »
Posted by Deborah Bain on June 29, 2009
The world is in the midst of an unprecedented wave of negotiations aimed at saving global agreements to keep nuclear weapons in check. The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, currently gaining momentum worldwide, would be a serious step towards disarmament: no tests effectively means no new weapons. However, opponents fear that the treaty's verification network would not catch small nuclear tests. Last month, that network proved itself by spotting a test in North Korea. Partly as a result, "I think the U.S. Read more »
Posted by Sarah Brown on June 24, 2009